CT Pulmonary Angiography Technical Quality and Reporting Checklist
Report CTPA adequacy, embolus distribution, right heart strain findings, and alternative diagnoses in a fixed sequence.

A CT pulmonary angiography report should first state whether the examination can exclude emboli at the claimed level. A negative result can be falsely reassuring when pulmonary arterial enhancement, motion, respiratory artifact, and bolus timing are not considered. In a positive study, record the most proximal clot level and right heart findings.
This checklist addresses interpretation of a completed diagnostic examination. The decision to order CTPA depends on clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and appropriateness guidance. Chronic thromboembolic disease, postoperative change, and low-flow artifact can mimic acute embolus.
Assessment framework
- Review main pulmonary arterial enhancement and bolus timing.
- State how motion, noise, and flow artifact affect segmental branches.
- Trace main, lobar, segmental, and visible subsegmental arteries.
- Compare right and left ventricular diameters in an appropriate axial plane.
- Survey lungs, pleura, mediastinum, aorta, and upper abdomen for another diagnosis.
What the report should contain
- When embolus is present, name the side, vessel, and most proximal level.
- Describe clot burden by anatomic distribution rather than a vague adjective.
- Record RV/LV ratio, septal flattening, and contrast reflux when present.
- For possible pulmonary infarction, state the location of peripheral opacity and pleural fluid.
- In a negative study, define the lowest reliably assessed arterial level.
Common errors
- Calling one low-attenuation focus on a motion-degraded series an embolus.
- Reporting a limited segmental examination as completely negative.
- Deriving a clinical risk class from imaging alone.
Example report wording
Example impression: The examination is diagnostic through the segmental arterial level. A central filling defect in the right lower-lobe posterior basal segmental artery is compatible with acute embolus. No main or lobar embolus is present. The RV/LV diameter ratio is 0.9, without septal flattening. A small peripheral wedge-shaped right lower-lobe opacity may represent infarction.
Compare the final wording with the acute pulmonary embolism reporting guide.
References
- American College of Radiology. Appropriateness Criteria: Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. Source (opens in a new tab)
- American College of Radiology. Practice Parameter for Thoracic CT. Source (opens in a new tab)
Clinical note: This material is for radiology education. Do not generate an automatic diagnosis or management decision without checking guideline scope, patient factors, and local policy.
Clinical use note
This content is educational and is not patient-specific medical advice. Every phrase, template, classification result, and recommendation must be verified and adapted by a physician using the complete examination, clinical context, current guidelines, and institutional protocol.
Adapt the report framework to the case
Use this review order with an editable RadPhrases template and verify every line against the images.
Related calculators
Browse the other checklists, phrase sets, and systematic approaches in this topic.