Brain MRI Reporting Checklist

A systematic guide to assessing sequences, diffusion, blood products, parenchyma, extra-axial spaces, and adjacent structures on routine adult brain MRI.

Brain MRI includes numerous sequences and contrast mechanisms. The same lesion provides different information on diffusion, FLAIR, susceptibility, and postcontrast images. The examination should therefore be read by cross-checking the same anatomical region across sequences rather than reviewing each sequence in isolation.

This checklist can be used to confirm the adequacy of the basic sequences and inclusion of important anatomical regions in routine adult brain MRI reports.

1. Clinical question, protocol, and safety information

☐ Read the indication. Headache, seizure, focal deficit, cognitive change, tumor follow-up, and suspected infection place different emphasis on the sequences.

☐ Confirm the protocol. Check for T1, T2, FLAIR, DWI/ADC, and susceptibility sequences and, when contrast was administered, appropriate postcontrast images.

☐ State contrast information clearly. Gadolinium administration, dose information, and the presence of postcontrast sequences should be documented in the technique.

☐ Motion and artifact. Specify which region is limited by susceptibility, dental material, flow, or motion artifact.

☐ Open the prior examination. Consider dates and protocol similarity when assessing lesion burden, size, enhancement, and volume change.

2. Review each sequence together with its purpose

☐ DWI and ADC. Distinguish true restricted diffusion from T2 shine-through and carefully assess the artifact-prone skull base and posterior fossa.

☐ FLAIR/T2. Check for edema, gliosis, white-matter lesions, cortical-subcortical signal abnormality, and CSF suppression.

☐ T1-weighted images. Use them to assess anatomy, fat or blood products, atrophy, and intrinsically T1-hyperintense foci before contrast.

☐ SWI or GRE. Assess microhemorrhage, hemosiderin, cavernous malformation, venous structures, and possible calcification; consider CT correlation when needed.

☐ Postcontrast T1. Systematically survey for parenchymal, leptomeningeal, pachymeningeal, and cranial nerve enhancement.

☐ Additional sequences. When perfusion, spectroscopy, 3D imaging, or angiography is present, assess it separately according to the indication and do not insert assumptions automatically into the standard report template.

3. Screen for acute findings first

☐ Acute ischemia. Determine location and distribution on DWI/ADC and interpret together with FLAIR and vascular signal findings.

☐ Acute or subacute hemorrhage. Assess susceptibility and T1/T2 signal together and state any mass effect or intraventricular extension.

☐ Herniation and hydrocephalus. Check the ventricles, basal cisterns, midline, and foramen magnum level.

☐ Suspected infection/abscess. Assess diffusion, ring enhancement, surrounding edema, and meningeal findings in the clinical context.

☐ Clues to venous thrombosis or major-vessel disease. Distinguish the scope of routine MRI/MRA and consider recommending a dedicated vascular examination when needed.

4. Cerebral hemispheres and cortex

☐ Cortical signal and thickness. Assess for focal thickening, FLAIR signal change, atrophy, and clues to cortical developmental abnormality.

☐ Subcortical and deep white matter. Describe lesion number, size, distribution, and morphology; avoid an overly definitive diagnosis for nonspecific findings.

☐ Deep gray nuclei. Check symmetry, signal, and diffusion changes in the basal ganglia and thalami.

☐ Corpus callosum. Assess signal, thickness, lesions, and developmental or postoperative changes.

☐ Medial temporal structures. Review hippocampal symmetry and signal according to the indication; when no epilepsy protocol was performed, state the limits of detailed assessment.

5. Posterior fossa and brainstem

☐ Brainstem. Survey the midbrain, pons, and medulla in axial and sagittal planes for signal abnormality, mass, and atrophy.

☐ Cerebellum. Is there ischemia, a mass, atrophy, or developmental change in the hemispheres, vermis, or peduncles?

☐ Fourth ventricle and cisterns. Assess obstruction, mass effect, and visible findings involving the cisternal segments of the cranial nerves.

☐ Craniocervical junction. Check the tonsillar level, foramen magnum, and imaged upper cervical cord.

6. Ventricles, sulci, and extra-axial spaces

☐ Ventricular size and symmetry. Distinguish enlargement due to atrophy from hydrocephalus using clinical and morphologic findings.

☐ Transependymal CSF flow. Try to distinguish periventricular FLAIR signal from chronic white-matter change.

☐ Sulci and cisterns. Assess age appropriateness, focal effacement, and extra-axial mass effect.

☐ Subdural/epidural spaces. Cross-check sequences for collections, blood products, or signs of empyema.

☐ Dura and leptomeninges. On contrast-enhanced examinations, state the distribution of thickening and enhancement.

7. Sella, orbits, sinuses, and mastoids

☐ Sella and pituitary. Within the limits of routine sections, note an obvious mass or empty-sella appearance; a dedicated protocol may be required for microadenoma assessment.

☐ Orbits and optic pathways. Assess an obvious mass, signal abnormality, or asymmetry within image-quality limitations.

☐ Paranasal sinuses. Note fluid levels, mucosal thickening, and mass-like opacification in the clinical context.

☐ Mastoid air cells. Check for fluid/opacification and signs of adjacent complications.

☐ Skull and scalp. Assess marrow signal, masses, and soft-tissue lesions to the extent included in the field of view.

8. Minimum data set for describing a lesion

• Precise anatomical location and side
• Size and, when possible, interval change
• T1, T2/FLAIR, DWI/ADC, and susceptibility characteristics
• Enhancement pattern and relationship to the meninges
• Surrounding edema, mass effect, and effect on ventricles/cisterns
• Solitary or multiple lesions and distribution pattern
• Positive and negative findings that narrow the differential diagnosis relevant to the clinical question
• Limitations caused by protocol or artifact

9. Impression

1. Place the acute and time-sensitive finding first.
2. Instead of merely stating that a lesion is “present,” summarize its location, size, behavior, and mass effect.
3. When findings are nonspecific, preserve the distinction between observation and interpretation.
4. State interval change clearly; if protocol differences limit comparison, say so.
5. Recommend an additional dedicated protocol or clinical correlation only when an important question remains unanswered by the examination.
6. Communicate critical results directly according to the local policy.

Communication of critical findings

10. Commonly overlooked areas

• Small posterior fossa infarcts on DWI
• Microhemorrhages and superficial siderosis on SWI/GRE
• Basal cisterns and cranial nerve relationships
• Corpus callosum and deep gray nuclei
• Craniocervical junction
• Sella and pituitary
• Leptomeningeal or pachymeningeal enhancement on contrast-enhanced imaging
• Small interval changes in enhancement

11. Example report framework

References

1. ACR Practice Parameter for Communication of Diagnostic Imaging Findings, Revised 2025. Report components and principles for nonroutine/urgent communication. Source (se abre en una pestaña nueva)
2. ACR-ASNR-SPR Practice Parameter for MRI of the Brain, Revised 2024. Framework for brain MRI performance, safety, and documentation. Source (se abre en una pestaña nueva)
3. ACR Practice Parameter for Performing and Interpreting MRI. Portal for general MRI practice and interpretation standards. Source (se abre en una pestaña nueva)