How to Use PI-RADS v2.1
PI-RADS v2.1 is a standardized assessment system that assigns a category from 1 to 5 to reflect the likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI. The most important rule is: DWI is the dominant sequence in the peripheral zone, whereas T2-weighted imaging is the dominant sequence in the transition zone.
The PI-RADS category is based on MRI findings only. PSA, PSA density, digital rectal examination, family history, and prior biopsy results are not added to the category, although they are considered together when making biopsy and management decisions.
What do the categories mean?
| Category | Likelihood statement for clinically significant cancer |
|---|
| PI-RADS 1 | Very low |
|---|
| PI-RADS 2 | Low |
|---|
| PI-RADS 3 | Intermediate/equivocal |
|---|
| PI-RADS 4 | High |
|---|
| PI-RADS 5 | Very high |
|---|
PI-RADS is not a stand-alone biopsy guideline. The official document emphasizes considering biopsy for PI-RADS 4–5 lesions and using clinical factors to guide decisions for PI-RADS 3 lesions.
Assess technical quality first
Poor technical quality is a major cause of incorrect categorization. Before reporting, check:
- Adequate spatial resolution on T2-weighted images
- High-b-value images and a reliable ADC map for DWI
- Geometric distortion caused by rectal gas
- Motion artifact
- Temporal resolution and contrast injection for DCE
- Postbiopsy hemorrhage
If a sequence is technically non-diagnostic, “X” may be assigned for that sequence. When DWI is inadequate—particularly for peripheral-zone assessment—repeat acquisition should be considered when possible.
1. Determine the lesion's zone
Zone assignment is fundamental because it determines the dominant sequence.
- Peripheral zone (PZ): DWI/ADC is dominant.
- Transition zone (TZ): T2-weighted imaging is dominant.
- The true origin may be difficult to determine for lesions near the anterior fibromuscular stroma or central zone.
When a lesion involves more than one zone, assess where its center and predominant component are located. Using the prostate sector map facilitates targeted biopsy and follow-up comparison.
2. Use the DWI score in the peripheral zone
In the peripheral zone, the overall category usually follows the DWI score:
- DWI 1 → PI-RADS 1
- DWI 2 → PI-RADS 2
- DWI 3 → PI-RADS 3 if DCE is negative; PI-RADS 4 if DCE is positive
- DWI 4 → PI-RADS 4
- DWI 5 → PI-RADS 5
The main scenario in which DCE directly changes the category is a DWI 3 lesion in the PZ. DCE is positive when there is focal early enhancement, or enhancement contemporaneous with adjacent prostatic tissue, corresponding to the suspicious focus. Diffuse enhancement or enhancement that does not match the T2/DWI abnormality is not considered positive.
3. Use the T2 score in the transition zone
Distinguishing lesions from benign prostatic hyperplasia is more difficult in the transition zone. T2 appearance is dominant:
- A typical, completely encapsulated BPH nodule may be regarded as a normal variant.
- A mostly encapsulated or smoothly circumscribed atypical nodule may receive a T2 score of 2.
- An ill-defined heterogeneous area may receive a T2 score of 3.
- A lenticular or non-circumscribed, homogeneous, moderately hypointense focus approaches T2 score 4–5 morphology.
In v2.1, DWI can upgrade selected TZ lesions:
- T2 score 2 and DWI score ≥4 → PI-RADS 3
- T2 score 3 and DWI score 5 → PI-RADS 4
- When the T2 score is 4 or 5, the overall category generally follows the same score
DCE is not the sequence that determines the overall category in the TZ.
4. Assess size and extraprostatic extension
The largest dimension and invasive behavior are important when distinguishing PI-RADS 4 from 5. In general, a lesion measuring 1.5 cm or more, or definite extraprostatic extension/invasive behavior, supports PI-RADS 5.
Measure the lesion on the sequence and plane that show it best. At minimum, report the largest diameter on the axial image. If extraprostatic extension is suspected, do not stop at the category. Also describe capsular irregularity, neurovascular-bundle involvement, seminal-vesicle invasion, and the relationship to adjacent organs.
5. Select the index lesion
PI-RADS v2.1 recommends marking up to four suspicious PI-RADS 3–5 lesions on the sector map. The index lesion is:
- The lesion with the highest PI-RADS category.
- If more than one lesion has the same category, the lesion showing extraprostatic extension takes priority.
- If there is no extraprostatic extension, the largest lesion within the highest category is considered the index lesion.
This rule highlights that a small lesion extending beyond the capsule may be more important than a larger intraprostatic lesion.
Report prostate volume
Prostate volume should be reported in every examination. The ellipsoid formula is widely used:
AP diameter × craniocaudal diameter × transverse diameter × 0.52
The volume allows calculation of PSA density. PSA density is not incorporated into the PI-RADS category, but it may be particularly important in the clinical management of PI-RADS 3 lesions.
Example case 1: Peripheral-zone DWI 3 lesion
Findings: A 9 mm lesion in the left posterolateral peripheral zone, focally low on ADC and high on high-b-value DWI, with definite but not marked diffusion restriction. DCE demonstrates corresponding focal early enhancement.
- Dominant sequence: DWI
- DWI score: 3
- DCE: Positive
- Overall category: PI-RADS 4
Example case 2: Atypical transition-zone nodule
Findings: A 12 mm, mostly encapsulated, homogeneous, mildly hypointense nodule in the right anterior transition zone; DWI score 4.
- T2 score: 2
- DWI score: 4
- Overall category: PI-RADS 3
Report example
Prostate volume is 48 mL. In the left posterolateral peripheral zone at the mid gland, corresponding to sector LM-PZpl, there is an 11 mm focal lesion. The lesion is markedly hypointense on the ADC map and markedly hyperintense on high-b-value DWI, with a DWI score of 4. Focal early enhancement is present on DCE. No evidence of extraprostatic extension is identified. The overall PI-RADS v2.1 category is 4.
Impression:
PI-RADS 4 lesion in the left peripheral zone, highly suspicious for clinically significant prostate cancer. Urologic assessment is recommended in conjunction with the clinical findings, PSA density, and biopsy history.
Common mistakes made by residents
1. Using the same dominant sequence in every zone
DWI is dominant in the PZ; T2 is dominant in the TZ.
2. Assuming DCE upgrades every lesion
The main categorical effect of DCE is on DWI 3 lesions in the PZ.
3. Automatically treating a BPH nodule as suspicious
Typical, completely encapsulated BPH nodules often do not require separate scoring.
4. Changing the category according to PSA
PSA and PSA density affect management, not the MRI category.
5. Selecting the index lesion based only on size
A higher category or extraprostatic extension takes priority.
6. Omitting lesion location from the impression
The sector, series/image number, and size may be critical for targeted biopsy.
Workstation checklist
- Is technical quality adequate, and is any sequence non-diagnostic?
- Did I identify the lesion's true zone?
- Did I use DWI as dominant in the PZ and T2 as dominant in the TZ?
- Did DCE affect the category only in the appropriate scenario?
- Did I report the largest diameter and sector location?
- Did I assess extraprostatic extension and seminal-vesicle invasion separately?
- Did I select the correct index lesion?
- Did I report prostate volume?
Frequently asked questions
Does PI-RADS 3 mean cancer?
No. It is the category in which the likelihood of clinically significant cancer is equivocal. PSA density, age, risk history, prior biopsy, and local practice are added to the decision-making process.
Can a PI-RADS category be assigned on noncontrast prostate MRI?
Biparametric MRI approaches may be used, but PI-RADS v2.1 includes specific rules regarding technical adequacy and missing sequences. Reporting should follow the institutional protocol and current evidence.
Is the PI-RADS category an arithmetic average of the sequence scores?
No. The system uses a zone-based dominant sequence and specific upgrade rules.
References
- American College of Radiology. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). Source (opens in a new tab)
- ACR, ESUR, AdMeTech Foundation. PI-RADS v2.1 (2019). Source (opens in a new tab)
- Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, et al. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of PI-RADS Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019;76(3):340–351.